Updates from Briffa: Creative Lawyers for Creative Businesses

17 January 2014

Here you will find articles of interest for creatives. Briffa are creative lawyers for creative businesses.

Further information on www.briffa.com

An end to brand hijacking in China?

 China has passed a new trade mark law that becomes effective on 1 May 2014. The new law includes:

A requirement that trade marks shall be registered and used “by the principal of honesty and credibility”;

  1. Some important changes to the trade mark application process; and
  2. As discussed here, a couple of notable provisions designed to improve trade mark enforcement in China.

Trade mark “hijacking” in China refers to the situation in which a third party registers a company’s established trade mark in China, often before the company enters the Chinese market, then attempts to sell the trade mark registration to the company when the company begins conducting business in China. As the existing law in China only forbids a trade mark owner’s agent or representative from registering the mark in his or her own name, trade mark hijacking has become a serious problem in China.

Chinese trade mark rights are based on the principal of first-to-register; whoever first registers a trade mark with the Chinese Trade Mark Office generally has the rights to that trade mark. Under this first-to-register principle, it has been relatively easy for trade mark hijackers to register established trade marks of others in China, then sell their rights to these trade marks to the legitimate owners.

New law designed to discourage trade mark hijacking by business partners

The new Chinese trade mark law provides a mechanism to discourage trade mark hijacking. The new law has essentially widened the class of restricted persons to cover an applicant who knows or should have known of the other party’s prior use of the trade mark, whether through some contractual or business relationship with the other party. An application to register a trade mark which is identical or similar to another party’s mark for identical or similar goods or services will be rejected if it is then opposed by the party who has prior use of the mark.

Broader definition of trade mark infringement

 The new law contains a list of actions that constitute trade mark infringement. Amongst those listed, it will constitute trade mark infringement if one purposefully facilitates or assists someone’s trade mark infringement activities. So, for example, if someone helps transport counterfeit NikeÒ shoes from one city to another, in the knowledge that the shoes are knockoffs, he or she – in addition to the manufacturers and sellers of the shoes – may be subject to penalties for trade mark infringement.

For brand owners looking to expand into the Chinese market, the new laws against trade mark squatters and counterfeiters are a step in the right direction.

If you would like to discuss applying for trade marks in China or enforcing your existing trade marks there, contact Briffa on 0207 288 6003 or email us at info@briffa.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s